The Financial Times October 8th issue hosted an article titled "A structural problem that may be here until 2015". The article refered to an analysis economists at the International Monetary Fund produced to explain the surprising differences in the unemployment levels after the crisis (e.g. US close to its postwar high, Germany at its lowest since the early 90s). They offered three chief explanations:
- Firstly, the obvious one of the various degrees of recession in each country.
- The second is "thought to be the combination of a fall in demand and acute problems in particular parts of the economy - especially finance and housing." This would help explain for example the US unemployment levels.
- Lastly, "countries that used active labour market policies such as government-sponsored short-time working schemes, saw smaller increases in unemployment."
It is not a new thing either. Krugman recounts: "Unemployment cannot be brought down rapidly", declared one 1935 analysis, "because the work force is unadaptable and untrained. It cannot respond to the opportunities which industry may offer." Talent pressures in a recessionary environment as far back as 1935 ... and we fancy ourselves so avant-garde in spotting these ironies.
No comments:
Post a Comment